cougfan1 wrote:
Real.Men.Wear.Blue wrote:
Were the reasons D-1 was out of the question the typical Title IX and funding issues? Or were there other reasons unique to BYU? I always thought that BYU should be able to compete very well at the D-1 level given the dominance of the club teams.
Although the soccer coach did not want to completely blame Title IX, he did give that as a reason. His main belief is that football has made funding more difficult. Why, I don't know? If anything, you would think that football has increased funding.
I read the article and saw his politically correct blame football and not the real culprit: Title IX. Ohio State makes so much money off of their 100k stadium ticket sales and TV deal that they can fund more sports. Yes, football is a resource drain, but if your product is good, it funds a lot of other programs since most sports are unable to pay their own way. BYU is one of those with a football program that ends up funding much of the athletic program at the school because of their success.
I think what they have accomplished in the PDL is terrific and a testament to the coach and quality of players. I think his complaining about football while avoiding how Title IX dictates the number of sports based on scholarships rather than on interest by the student body was pretty cheap since football does more good for the school than all the other sports combined. Yet, as I understand it, the club sports get very little if any financial support directly from the University and have to raise the funds or have generous benefactors. Anyone know where they get their funding besides from summer camp fees?