Cornellcoug wrote:
timmyboy wrote:
Cornellcoug wrote:
timmyboy wrote:
If BYU wins out, craig is right - BYU will land a 4 or 5. That would be 16-1 over the last 17 games with likely 5 wins over RPI top 50 teams (likely) - 2 times over UNLV, 3 times over New Mexico.
Plus, they may have no losses to teams with less than 20 teams. Plus a good win over Louisville and some close losses to MSU and UNC. Great resume.
History has shown that even if BYU is deserving they do not get a seed that is very high. I would say that a 6 seed is about as high as they will get based on history even if they are ranked 16.
Cornellcoug - history actually points the opposite way. BYU has only had two teams with comparable records to what they would be if they won out (28-6).
Those two teams are the 1979-80 team (24-5) and the 1987-88 (26-6) teams. And guess what seeds they got - #3 and #4, respectively.
Interestingly, though, the next closest teams were '81 and '92 teams, with 7 losses each (but less wins than this year's teams, so lower winning percentage). Those teams got 6 and 10 seeds.
However, BYU's schedule was probably more difficult this year than all of those years. So, this team probably has an advantage in that respect.
That is why I predict that if BYU wins out, 4-5 seed. If they lose one game, 6-8 seed.
The problem is that you are comparing different times. Back then they had 3 NBA players on the roster and were better respected than they are now.
Maybe. But, I'm not sure BYU doesn't get as much respect now as they did then. The media seems to love Tavernari. Plus, Vitale loves Plaisted and Cummard is playing like an animal. People do see this. All you have to do is look at the box score to see how well Cummard is playing.
Different time? Maybe. But I'm not convinced.