Hawkeye-Coug wrote:
I disagree. With our RPI we were deserving of a 6 seed. For example, compare our RPI (25) to Purdue, who had a 44 RPI and a 6 seed. We played consistently well during the season, and deserved the rewards that come with it. Our streak of post-season futility should have no bearing on this years seed.
What is frustrating is that we played so poorly. We may not be able to shake tough defense, but we can make our free throws.
Go Cougs!!!!!!!
I think we got the seeding we deserved. We haven't shown the committee we're ligitimate contenders. All we showed them this season was we're close. We were close to winning against UNC, close against MSU, close against WF, close against UNLV in the MWC tourney and close against A&M.
Close, but no cigar. We want love and "respect" from the committee we have to show we can finish close, important games, and we can't.
Only "respectable" win this season was over a dipleated Louisville team. Sure our RPI was 25, but a lot of that had to do with the fact we just played UNC, MSU and WF. We got browny points for losing to them. Next year, if we want the seed we "deserve" we have to win those games.