Mars wrote:
Finishing #2 in the nation for the 3rd year in a row is nothing to sneeze at. Rugby has easily been our most successful sport this decade I would say, with lacrosse and volleyball right behind.
I agree. BYU has shown the ability to beat anybody except Cal. But then no one else seems able to beat Cal either. Cal has fielded a rugby team since 1882. According to the information in the program that I bought, rugby was Cal's first intercollegiate sport.
BYU's rugby success without varsity sport status is very significant. You could say BYU just repeated as the national collegiate club champions and Cal repeated as the NCAA varsity rugby champions.
Of the 327 D-1 schools, Cal is the only one where rugby is a varsity sport. BYU's rugby success without the varsity sport status is very significant. You could say BYU just repeated as the national collegiate club champions

and Cal repeated as the varsity rugby champions.
Every year Cal has 50-70 players on the team. That depth gives them an advantage in tournaments like for the NC. Cal started several different players for the BYU game as compared to the St. Mary's game.
In the first round of the playoffs Cal benched their first squad for the entire game against Tennessee yet still won 102-3.
Overall, BYU is making fine progress with their rugby program. Cal is the program to which all other collegiate programs can aspire. Even though it is a varsity sport at Cal, they do not receive athletic scholarships like all the other varsity sports. Still they have a 98% graduation rate. Their success both on and off the field is phenomenal.
That we were the last one standing against them is a tribute to BYU rugby.