Mars wrote:

I mistyped. And you still haven't answered the question.

I assumed that this would have sufficed to answer your question "How did Utah do against the Spurs last year?" in this post:

snoscythe wrote:

Assuming you misstyped, which is a honest possibility (I for one admit that I often find typos in my posts that require later edits) than I will in fact concede that last year the Jazz would have lost to the Suns in the playoffs.

In a more direct answer, the Jazz lost to a better Spurs team in 5 games in the Western Conference Finals last year--coincidentally the same number of games it took the Suns to lose to a poorer Spurs team this year two rounds earlier.

Again, I have conceded 2006-2007 to the Suns. More importantly, in none of my posts have I argued that fact.

What I have been arguing is this last season and to that effect your "question" was not a query as much as a non sequitor to try and derail a debate you knew you had lost--the debate to that point was regarding this most recent season. Failing to respond to a non sequitor hardly qualifies as ceding the contest. Rather, it is the party resorting to non sequitor who has more properly ceded the point by abandoning discourse and reason.

Now is your turn to either stop "tap-dancing" around the issues.

All I ask for is some objective analysis about how the Suns 2007-2008 would have beaten the Jazz. I have refuted your every claim to that point, and rather than engaging in any form of debate, you have resorted to non-sequitor and petty name calling.

Give me facts and reason, and drop the cute attempts to avoid the appearance of defeat--they simply make you look even more trollish and juvenile.