HEE HEE!

Earth to suuwr...you do need to get a life. All the hate this and hate that. Give me a break. I don't think anyone was saying that Bynam is at KG's level just they think he MAY ( I capitalized it so you wouldn't miss it...may means he may yes or he may no ...FYI) be a force in the future. I don't think the Lakers have the depth of the Celtics and that certainly showed. Maybe Luke Walton was drafted because of his name? I don't think the Jazz will ever get there until they get someone in the middle who will plug things up. Not your best play to have your center out there shooting 3's.

I was glad for several of the Celtics. The Lakers are too one-dimensioned (read Kobe) and expanding his supporting cast will help. I have never had any delusions that Kobe is in MJ's league. But MJ also had a pretty good group of teammates to support him. All the great ones do/did IMO. But the great ones elevate the play of those around them. I think Kobe misses terribly in that regard.

One game does not a collapse make.

BoiseBYU wrote:

Not that he is on par with KG, but where do you think the Celtics would have ended up without KG playing?

So make up your mind. In the same sentence you say that Bynum is not on par with KG but then imply Bynum is on par with KG because the Celtics wouldn't have been as good with KG out. Typical Laker logic. You can't have it both ways.

Say whatever you want but the fact is the Lakers are an embarrassment. Kobe played like a rookie. Phil Jackson was out coached by a man that never won a playoff series, and the Lakers are as fake and plastic as the celebs that attend their games.

It been a long time since I've slept as well as I did last night and then I get on and read how Jordan Farmar is going to make the Lakers better next year!?! You have a better chance of convincing Al Gore that global warming is a hoax.

Go Jazz. You better be ready next year. Jordan Farmar and Luke Walton will be ready for you.

ps Sorry if I'm coming off as mean and sarcastic. I just can't stand the Lakers. They are right up there with the Yewts.

suuwr wrote:

BoiseBYU wrote:

Not that he is on par with KG, but where do you think the Celtics would have ended up without KG playing?

So make up your mind. In the same sentence you say that Bynum is not on par with KG but then imply Bynum is on par with KG because the Celtics wouldn't have been as good with KG out. Typical Laker logic. You can't have it both ways.

Say whatever you want but the fact is the Lakers are an embarrassment. Kobe played like a rookie. Phil Jackson was out coached by a man that never won a playoff series, and the Lakers are as fake and plastic as the celebs that attend their games.

It been a long time since I've slept as well as I did last night and then I get on and read how Jordan Farmar is going to make the Lakers better next year!?! You have a better chance of convincing Al Gore that global warming is a hoax.

Go Jazz. You better be ready next year. Jordan Farmar and Luke Walton will be ready for you.

ps Sorry if I'm coming off as mean and sarcastic. I just can't stand the Lakers. They are right up there with the Yewts.

I do think Farmar will evolve into a good NBA point guard, I was disappointed when he went to LA and not seattle .

I don't think the lakers are going to win a championship until they commit to play consistent defense. There has been some talk of them trying to get Ron Artest, which might put them over the edge. As they are now, I think Kobe is to lazy on defense and Gasal is too soft. They just don't have the right mentality to win a championship imho.

I also think the Jazz have the exact same problem. They aren't necessarily "soft" on defense they either don't play it, or they aren't very good at it. I think they need to lose Memo, and pick up a real center, but I still don't know if that would be enough. . .

Don't worry though, my sonics still suck, and they have been sold to oklahoma city, so I'm not even sure I have a real team any more.

Anytime the Utes, Lakers, or the Yankees lose, it's a GREAT day. Congrats to Mr. Ainge and the Celts!

mountaincougar wrote:

Earth to suuwr...you do need to get a life. All the hate this and hate that. Give me a break. I don't think anyone was saying that Bynam is at KG's level just they think he MAY ( I capitalized it so you wouldn't miss it...may means he may yes or he may no ...FYI) be a force in the future. I don't think the Lakers have the depth of the Celtics and that certainly showed. Maybe Luke Walton was drafted because of his name? :) I don't think the Jazz will ever get there until they get someone in the middle who will plug things up. Not your best play to have your center out there shooting 3's.

I was glad for several of the Celtics. The Lakers are too one-dimensioned (read Kobe) and expanding his supporting cast will help. I have never had any delusions that Kobe is in MJ's league. But MJ also had a pretty good group of teammates to support him. All the great ones do/did IMO. But the great ones elevate the play of those around them. I think Kobe misses terribly in that regard.

One game does not a collapse make.

One game? Did you watch the finals? The Celtics made a joke of the Lakers. The same Celtics that needed 7 games to beat Atlanta. Don't give me that crap that Kobe doesn't have a team around him. They only lost 8 games since the Gasol trade and all of a sudden, because of the loss in the finals, Kobe doesn't have talent around him. That is a pathetic argument.

Since I apparently have no life and and mountaincougar is the authority, could you please help me get one?