pogipingelLiving in Morgantown, WV (WVU) the only college football I get is the Big East. I agree their record this year is better and they may be a little tougher overall than the MWC, but year to year they are no different than the MWC minus the top two schools from each. They are so horrible. Week after week I go to Milan Puskar stadium and watch WVU play horrible strategicless football (Slaton right, Slaton left) and kill teams. Rutgers is improved, but as a whole they don't deserve to be a BCS conference any more than any other mid-major with two tough top schools. Why do think Miami was so good for so long? They played in the Big East, and now that they are gone, they are no longer a top 25 team.
Miami's power wasn't fueled by the Big East. They built their power as an independent and then joined Big East. Their demise is due to other circumstances not conference affiliation.
It's also unfair to compare conferences "minus the top two teams" because that assumes that the top two teams are on par. That is not the case. BYU and Utah aren't even close to being on par with Louisville and West Virginia. If you are going to evaluate conference strength, you have to take the entire conference as a whole.
That being said other than 2004 the MWC hasn't been close to touching the Big East with top to bottom success.